Sharp lessons for torturers

The whole episode is shameful and not just because was crude, brutal and dishonest. It was also stupid: it's as if, blinded by the promise of limitless support and resources from the White House, the CIA's professionals forgot all their trade-craft and signed up instead to the simpler doctrines of the military's SERE program, in which participants are tortured because of course that's what other, less sophisticated, countries do. In particular, they set aside the lessons of what some call the inquisitor's Bible: John Tolliver's The Interrogator, a study of the Luftwaffe's Hanns Joachim Scharff.
Scharff was perhaps the most effective interrogator in history (one ex-POW said "Hanns could probably get a confession of infidelity from a nun"). Courteous and humane, he was known for the efforts he made to improve conditions for wounded or sick prisoners, as well as for his ability to secure them rare treats like chocolate and cognac.
Scharff was no pushover he wanted, and got, operational information but his technique worked by reminding his prisoners of a shared humanity that extended beyond this question, this room, this war. He was constantly tempting them to release the mental pressure that was causing them so much anxiety. He knew that these boys had one big imperative: to resist brutality; so he was not brutal and, by and large, they did not resist. They dropped their guards and unwittingly let pass little scraps of news he could assemble in his meticulous, organized mind.
Scharff was perhaps the most effective interrogator in history (one ex-POW said Hanns could probably get a confession of infidelity from a nun) ”
It is rare that ex-prisoners would hold a reunion to fκte their interrogator, but Sharff's did (in 1980, where the guests also included Generals Jimmy Doolittle and Curtis LeMay). And his ability to put together minute clues into a big picture served him well in his post-war career as a mosaicist; if you like, you can see his handiwork in Sleeping Beauty's castle at Disneyland.
Everyone in the business knows about Scharff - so why did they forget his example? Because they were in a hurry; because they were lazy; because the Bush administration, here as elsewhere, had no use for history.
Disclaimer: The material(s) in our posts and follow-up comments are mostly submitted by our members and to the best of our knowledge they are factual, accurate and consistent with their sources, -The Backroom Blog is not responsible for the contents in this post, neither endorse, support, promote or harvest any of the activities described herein- if you think any of the postings in this blog are misrepresenting individuals or places or are in any way inaccurate, do not hesitate to report it to The site Administrator.

